Prince Harry and Meghan Markle . File photoLONDON, Jan 16Prince Harry's lawyers have asked the Home Office to reconsider their decision to strip him of his 24-hour police protection, PA reports, citing a spokesman for the Duke of Sussex.»The Duke of Sussex has filed for review decision by the Home Office to deny him police protection at his and his family's expense while they are in the UK,» the statement said. >Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will get rid of the «inconvenient» house in CaliforniaPrince Harry is considered to be under threat from birth. He remains sixth in line to the British throne, he also served two years in Afghanistan, so he may be under threat from terrorists. The decision to refuse round-the-clock security was taken after Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle refused to perform official duties and lost royal status. The level of threat to royalty is determined by advisers to the UK Home Office, the Queen's Private Secretary for Security and a special committee. As a general rule, 24/7 state protection is provided to members of the royal family while on official duty. Meanwhile, according to the British media, Prince Harry was still under 24/7 police protection when he attended the funeral of his grandfather, Prince Philip, in April last year, however, arriving in the summer of that year for the opening of a monument to Princess Diana, the prince's security was provided by his personal bodyguard, and not by the British government. It is reported that if the legal procedures go further, this will lead to a trial in the High Court between the British government and Prince Harry. This will be the first case of a legal battle between the government and a member of the royal family. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle scare hotel guests
