MOSCOW, Mar 19, Alexander Sergeev. Former president of Spartak Moscow Andrey Chervichenko said that he was waiting for the statements of the ex-member of the board of directors of the capital's football club Zarema Salikhova about refereeing after the match Nizhny Novgorod — Spartak. In the match of the 22nd round of the Russian Football Championship, Spartak could not beat Nizhny Novgorod on check out. The meeting ended with the score 1:1. Paolo Vanoli's team remained in ninth place in the standings. «The result was surprising, I thought Spartak would win. When you start to soberly assess the details after the match, you understand that jumping on the edge and waving your arms is not enough for a good coaching career. The team must «Now Spartak's game is based on the individual skills of the players, the team is not tied into a single organism. Hence the result. There is no global advantage over the opponent, hence all these hysterics about refereeing. I kept waiting for Zarema's performance after match. Zarema without comments about refereeing is like borscht without beets,» Chervichenko said. The referee of the match, Sergey Ivanov, did not see a violation of the rules in the episode. «The episode with Ayrton seemed rude to me, although it was playful. According to the latest interpretations, at such moments the footballer is punished with a red card. Ivanov could have looked at VAR during the break, corrected the decision and showed the card. If this is not was done, then there should be arguments about this.But this episode was not the key, because Ayrton is not the figure, the absence of which does not allow Spartak to beat Nizhny Novgorod,» the agency's interlocutor added.
