A police officer is holding handcuffs. File photoMOSCOW, Apr 13Lawyers for a Russian citizen, businessman Vladislav Klyushin, who is being held in the United States, filed an appeal to change the measure of restraint for his client, pointing out that many documents from his case «show signs of falsification.» The owner of the M 13 company, Vladislav Klyushin, was arrested in Switzerland on 21 March 2021 at the request of the US authorities. In the United States, he is accused of economic crimes related to trading in securities of leading American companies on the stock markets. In December 2021, despite protests from the defense, Klyushin was extradited to the United States.The owner of «M 13″ Klyushin filed a lawsuit against BloombergThe Russian does not recognize the charges imputed to him, he remains under arrest for the duration of the trial, he was denied release on bail. of the State of Massachusetts, which is conducting the Klyushin case, the lawyers of the Russian businessman filed an appeal to change the preventive measure. In the appeal, the defense indicates that one of the fragments of the document contained in the Klyushin case file with the signature of Judge Marianne Bowler and the seal of the court was inserted using the editing program in more than in 30 official documents — in affidavits (affidavits given under oath), warrants, statements. Photocopies of documents from the court case of Russian businessman Vladislav Klyushin, held in the USA .jpg» />Photocopies of documents from the court case of Russian businessman Vladislav Klyushin held in the USAPhotocopies of documents from the court case of Russian businessman Vladislav Klyushin held in the USA of 2Photocopies of documents from the trial of Russian businessman Vladislav Klyushin held in the US1 of 2Photocopies of documents from the trial of Russian businessman Vladislav Klyushin held in the US2 of 2Photocopies of documents from the trial of Russian businessman Vladislav Klyushin held in the USSimilarly, according to the defense, these In the same documents, a signature was inserted, actually performed by a third party on behalf of FBI Special Agent B.D. Kang. By comparing Kang's original signature and his signature inserted into these documents through the use of appropriate computer programs, according to Klyushin's defense, «dramatic differences between them» are visible to the naked eye. «Based on viewing the files in the archive, it appears that one spreadsheet has been changed,» Klyushin's lawyers point out.
