GENERICO.ruПолитикаWashington “surprise”: who oversaw the massacre on our border

Washington “surprise”: who oversaw the massacre on our border

“Now the Pentagon is biting their nails in annoyance”

After the figures of losses announced by the Russian military department that the Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered this week, attacking the borders of the Belgorod and Kursk regions, everyone is asking the question: for the sake of Why did Kyiv put 1,500 soldiers in a useless attempt to break through our defenses? Did the Ukrainian Armed Forces command really not understand how it would all end? The answer can be found if you remember what statements have been made from Washington in recent months.

Here, for example, is what was said in the report of the head of the CIA, William Burns, released on February 1, 2024: “ This year will be difficult for Ukraine. Kyiv’s task is not only to achieve progress on the front line, but also to deliver deeper strikes (in the Russian rear — “MK”) and achieve sustainable success in the Black Sea.”

The Ukrainian Armed Forces clearly did not have successes on the front line. On February 17, Avdeevka, a large fortified area of ​​the Ukrainian Armed Forces, was lost. But the US CIA’s idea of ​​striking Russian rear areas, apparently, began to be implemented in Kyiv with particular zeal. Washington most likely advised that these provocations be timed to coincide with the Russian presidential elections.

At the beginning of February, a long epic happened with the resignation of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny and the appointment in his place of General Alexander Syrsky, whom the Ukrainian soldiers themselves nicknamed “General-200” for the “meat assaults” (the two hundredth is usually designated as the dead). And on February 11, US Army General Ben Godges said that Syrsky would be an “unpleasant surprise” for the Russians on the battlefield.

According to CNN, Zelensky immediately began to put pressure on the new commander in chief, demanding that he develop a new plan, to avoid stagnation at the front. It is clear that Zelensky did not act on his own initiative. The elder just ordered. Syrsky, presumably, took the lead and began to implement the project “Breaking through the border and transferring hostilities to Russian territory”).

Already on March 6, the US State Department hinted that the Ukrainian Armed Forces had prepared military “surprises” for Russia and were waiting for results.

Probably, the main violin in the impending provocation was played not by Syrsky (he was in the wings), but by the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR) of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kirill Budanov (recognized as an extremist in Russia). On March 11, literally the day before the first attack on the Belgorod and Kursk regions, the main Ukrainian spy launched disinformation. In an interview, he stated that “the Main Intelligence Directorate is preparing for a serious operation in Crimea.” He blew information smoke about “checking the routes of entry and exit from there.”

Obviously, he wanted to confuse our military and send them on the wrong trail.

Finally, on the night of Tuesday, March 12, a three-thousand-strong Ukrainian Armed Forces group began an operation to break through to Belgorod. The fighting went on for four days, and it is known how it ended for the Main Intelligence Directorate and the Armed Forces of Ukraine: they washed themselves in blood.

Here is what military expert Vladislav Shurygin noted about this: “Apparently, the go-ahead for the final transfer of hostilities to the Russian The Ukrainian Armed Forces received their territories from their American masters. And this is exactly the Ukrainian “surprise” that the Americans announced at one of the briefings two weeks ago. Now the Pentagon is biting their nails in annoyance and wondering how to properly explain this failure and who should be blamed? It looks like “GUR-genius” Budanov will be responsible for everything…”

But this raises a reasonable question: if Kiev was preparing a “surprise” for us not alone, but together with Washington curators, maybe we too “ please the States with some surprise? That would be fair.

ОСТАВЬТЕ ОТВЕТ

Пожалуйста, введите ваш комментарий!
пожалуйста, введите ваше имя здесь

Последнее в категории