Go to mediabankMOSCOW, 27 Oct. With the risk of a nuclear conflict over the situation in Ukraine, the US should analyze the «Cuban» experience of President John F. Kennedy, Harvard Kennedy School professor Graham T. Ellison said in an article for the National Interest. source of clues. They «may shed light on the challenges facing the United States today and on the choices that President Joe Biden is making.»Putin commented on his words about nuclear weapons, said in 2018. The author of the article recalled that 60 years ago, on October 27, 1962, there was a “gloomy day”, which became the most dangerous crisis in history, which could lead to the death of hundreds of millions of people. «Obviously, that Ukraine is not Cuba, Putin is not Khrushchev, and 2022 is far from 1962. Moreover, history is not a cookbook with recipes that, if strictly followed, you can get a soufflé, «Ellison noted. The expert described the basic principles from Kennedy's experience, which «should» and «shouldn't» be followed for a successful exit from the crisis.»Do you want a nuclear war?» The American disrupted the speech of the senator First, one must recognize the structural realities of the conditions in which the confrontation takes place, the author suggested. He added that these realities are best reflected in Ronald Reagan's favorite phrase: «There can be no winners in a nuclear war, and therefore it should never be unleashed.» Secondly, according to the author, the United States should «project American strength and determination , demonstrating its strength to the enemy. «Third, Ellison noted, you need to clearly define America's vital interests and how to protect them.The White House has declared a desire to reduce the risks of unleashing a nuclear war «The «no» includes a ban on the use of nuclear weapons, since any use of nuclear weapons will trigger an escalation leading both sides to a full-scale nuclear war, and this will mean the destruction of the United States,» the author wrote. .Second, according to Ellison, a conventional military attack that kills hundreds of enemy soldiers should not be allowed: this, too, will be a stepping stone to an escalation that can quickly lead to the use of nuclear weapons.
Moscow stands for the inadmissibility of nuclear war, said LavrovPresident Vladimir Putin, in a September address to the Russians, said that the West had crossed every line in its anti-Russian policy and constant threats against Moscow. According to him, nuclear blackmail has also come into play, and high-ranking representatives of NATO countries are saying that it is possible and admissible to use weapons of mass destruction against Russia. Earlier, the head of EU diplomacy, Josep Borrell, speaking at the opening of the European Diplomatic Academy, promised a «powerful military response» to Moscow in the event of the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The document on the foundations of the country's state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence, approved by decree of the Russian President, clearly defines the conditions for its use. In accordance with the document, Moscow reserves the right to use nuclear weapons upon receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of Russia or its allies; the use of nuclear or other types of weapons of mass destruction on the territory of Russia and its allies; the impact of the enemy on critical state or military installations, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the retaliatory actions of nuclear forces; aggression against Russia using conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened. 966e278cd88fa5602d52fefdf78acd3b.jpg» />Biden said Russia's use of nuclear weapons would be a mistake
